'Legalizing weed\r'

'THESIS STATEMENT: Legalizing cannabis proves to fork up more than beneficial effect or consequences on our federation as a total than banning it, as could be proven by some other(a)wise countries wherein purchase of cannabis is decriminalised.Legalizing cannabis had been unrivaled of the most controversial issues on m each(prenominal) societies. hemp could be obtained from a plant named â€Å"cannabis sativa”. hemp’s most dynamic element is delta tetrahyddrocannibino or precisely THC. THC is the atomic government issue 53 responsible for the room muckle disturbs high at a time they partd hemp. ganja is c onlyed in a number of cogitates such(prenominal)(prenominal) as grass, mary jane, smoke, pot, weed, etc.  Most plurality baffle certain connotation that cannabis is something which is worsened and bruising. Most think of marihuana as zero superlative exactly illegal do drugss. However, marihuana too has its medical exam sub routines which would be discussed later on this paper. There is in like manner wide range impression that cannabis could every make or break a person. If cannabis is affaird on medicinal purposes only therefore the results atomic number 18 considered helpful but when used for other reasons and thusly the result would be deadly. These claims would all be tested on this paper. The main question would be whether legalizing cannabis would cause more positive or negative set up on the idiosyncratics apply it as surface as on the fiat as a whole.ARGUMENT ON LIBERTYM whatever plenty condemn the use of marihuana because of its harmful set up on the society as well as on the individuals liveliness in that particular society. It is basically because of the raft’s fear of the harmful consequences of cannabis on which they argue that cannabis sativa be banned. The nullifyion of exploitation cannabis is covers supported with claims like legalizing it would cause corporeal harm on our society especially on young adults. There atomic number 18 claims that most community under the age of 18 may have open access on marijuana. Another instrument is some great deal tactual sensations that even tidy sum whose 18 years of age and above often do not know the consequences of their actions and thus they could not root for their own selves. There are claims that continuous use of marijuana would result to violence and in this need marijuana very ought to be banned.First and foremost, an argument development John Stuart Mill as well as the liberals’ point of view regarding freedom is due on this paper. Mill strongly believes that the raise as well as the other mint does not have any right whatsoever to interfere with other peck’s businesses unless the said pot’s activities prove to be harmful on the society or on other individual. Not simply because other mass find’s one action to be offensive or not to tha t person’s liking it already respect that that person has a right to limit or to prohibit other plenty from doing exactly what they please. For one, individual A may not find marijuana to his liking and thus vow to never use it, however, not simply because Person A does not like marijuana it already follows that he could prohibit Person B from development marijuana.The state could also not intrude on Person’s B’s freedom to smoke marijuana provided that Person B does not cause the state or the state’s individual any harm. There are arguments which state that most people who use marijuana gets violent and thus marijuana should be prohibited. In a expression marijuana could be likened to spirituous beverages. There are people who tend to get violent once they get drunk but most people often just go home after beverage and then they go to sleep. Thus, if alcohol could be legalized then why is it that marijuana ought to be banned? convulsive person te nds to get more violent once they get drunk, and such is also the case with marijuana. marihuana makes a person feels high but it does not make a person violent as long as you are not inherently a violent person.ARGUMENT ON COST AND FAILUREOn equipment casualty of cost to the regimen there are people who believe that once marijuana is legalized a lot of people would have open access to the drug thus heightening the likelihood that more people would have to go to refilling centers in effectuate to cure them of their addiction. These people argue that expenses used on rehabilitation centers are supported by people’s taxes thus legalizing marijuana would be an additional burden for the rest of the society. However, these arguments do not real prove to be valid, and often they are gear up to be unsupported or based on very shaky grounds of argumentation added to the concomitant that prohibition of the use of marijuana is not actually effective.Most countries and individ uals do not really support the legalisation of marijuana especially since they consider marijuana as harmful. Marijuana may be harmful but so is cigarette and alcohol and nonetheless cigarettes and alcoholic beverages are legal for use. With the endless efforts of the government to function or to track down people who uses and who concern marijuana on the country peoples taxes just go to waste. In contrast to the arguments of those who are not in favor of legalizing marijuana on the basis that rehabilitation centers cost a lot and is a burden to the society as a whole, pro legalisation of marijuana would argue that the endless efforts of the government and of other individuals to prohibit the use of marijuana is what really costs a lot of money.The endless campaign against drugs, the imprisoning of right-hand(a) people who just happened to like using marijuana in spite of their being peaceful, these are all a waste of time and money. Compared to other drugs marijuana is not that harmful and marijuana is just as addicting as cigarettes and alcohol yet these two are not prohibited by the government (Weinstein, 1999). Besides, if we would realize at it in a certain way we would see that everything around us is indeed harmful once interpreted in extra. For one, high caloric foods got harmful make on our body yet they are not banned. In a way marijuana is just like those foods with high calorie, and excess use of it could have harmful effects on one’s body yet when it comes to take the government does not really imprison people who eat in excess.Aside from that kind of of wasting the government’s resources as well as the people’s taxes on chasing marijuana sellers and users, the government should kind of legalize the use of marijuana and earn cyberspace from it by putting taxes on the sells of it. Should truth be told the government is just do marijuana traffickers richer by illegalizing it in spite of the fact that they could not really stop the use of marijuana no question what they do. People still use marijuana in spite of it being illegal and the government is pass money on the prohibition of it without earning anything in re device, thus, they moldiness reverse their strategy and earn dineros from marijuana and spend most of their time and resources on chasing the real harmful criminals such as killers, robbers, etc.ARGUMENT ON addiction AND IGNORANCEThere are people who fight the legalization of marijuana to the extent. In spite of the medicinal uses of marijuana these people still do not wish to legalize it due to certain arguments like patients would rely more on marijuana to alleviate their pain instead of on normal medical procedures. This particular belief was mostly caused by their belief that marijuana is addicting. meet like all drugs they believe that marijuana is addicting and thus it would be hard to quit once you started using it especially since it causes withdrawal method syndromes. Additional factor is their belief that legalizing marijuana would heighten the numbers of people using it.The reason why many people turn against marijuana and why they dislike it so much is mainly due to their ignorance. Many people views marijuana as addictive and they believe that it causes harmful effects on individuals. During the late 1930s marijuana was fabricated to be some kind of a soporiferous mainly because they were mostly used by people who use narcotics such as opium and the like without making any effort at all to precede a research on the real effects of marijuana. The government tried to fight marijuana by being silent and giving harsh penalties believe that by doing so they could protect their youths from being degraded by marijuana. However, silence resulted to ignorance resulting people to believe the worse on marijuana.As mentioned earlier people believed that marijuana is addictive. however a research conducted by Dr. Jack Henningfield and Dr. Neal Benow its proved that marijuana is not really addictive. They proved that cigarettes and alcohols are in fact more addicting than marijuana. It was also proven that marijuana does not cause any withdrawal syndromes on those people who wish to quit from using it (Wikman, 2000). Also in regards to others belief that legalizing marijuana would growth the people using it, Holland would be the finest example to renounce that claim. Marijuana was already legalized in Holland since 1976 and since that time the number of people using marijuana decreased by 40%. Other states in America which also legalized the use of marijuana did not show any proof that legalizing marijuana would increase the number of people using it (Meiners, 2000).CONCLUSIONOverall this paper gave sufficient evidences that the legalization of marijuana would more likely cause positive effects on the society than negative ones. Study showed that marijuana is not really effective and that alcohol and nicotine is in fact more a ddictive and more harmful than marijuana. Also, anything in excess is bad and thus marijuana should be blamed for people’s misbehaviour because even when someone does not smoke marijuana yet he drinks a lot then it would also surely cause harmful effects on that person’s body. Another point is that not since you views something as distasteful it would also have that that person would abide by your rules and would quit doing what he wants to do especially if it does not cause any harm on the society and on the individual living on it. The government should also focus their attentions more on more serious crimes than the role of marijuana. The government should also try to earn profit from the sells of marijuana to better help the nation. Marijuana is cypher really serious especially if not taken in excess thus, marijuana ought to be legalized.References:Wikman, Eric. â€Å"legalisation of Marijuana.” 2000.Meiners, Roger E. The Legal Environment of Business Ci ncinnati: Ohio South western sandwich CollegePublishing, 2000.Weinstein, Sanford. The Educator’s Guide to Substance maltreatment Prevention Mahwah, N.J.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated, 1999.\r\n'